Deployed inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer. Signed by their QA.
Home›Use cases
Use cases

One operation. Seven use cases.

Every use case is the same job: take a reference set, check the documents that should meet it, and return a verdict for every line, linked to its source passage, for a person to sign.

01 IngestRequirements, offers, SOPs, ledgers.
02 ExtractRequirements, claims and figures.
03 CompareAny number of sources against one reference.
04 Trace & signEvery verdict linked. A person approves.

Create the reference

Write the requirements that every later check runs against.

01 Live

Requirements drafting

A URS, spec or tender package drafted from your process inputs, standards and past projects, in your template.

Drafting Agent →
InputsProcess descriptions, standards, prior specs and tenders
OutputA draft reference set, each requirement linked to where it came from
BuyerValidation, engineering and tender owners
ValueWeeks off the first draft, and fewer gaps baked in
  • Life SciencesURS drafted from process and regulatory inputs.
  • Medical DevicesDesign inputs from user needs and standards.
  • ConstructionScope and spec packages from drawings and codes.
  • TelecomNetwork and tender specs from standards and past projects.

Compare against it

Language-heavy checks, one line at a time, with the passage behind every answer.

02 Live

Offer vs requirements

Every bid checked against every requirement. Gaps a vendor silently misses surface before award, not as change orders after it.

Offer Comparison Agent →
ReferenceYour URS, technical spec or award criteria
SourcesThree or more vendor offers
OutputA compliance matrix per bid, each verdict linked to the offer passage
BuyerTechnical evaluation owner first, then procurement

Running today: vendor test specs checked against the URS at a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer.

03

RFI and RFP response check

Your own response checked against the customer’s request before you submit. Missed mandatory items found while there is still time to fix them.

Bid Check Agent →
ReferenceThe customer’s RFI, RFP or tender
SourcesYour draft response and attachments
OutputGaps, contradictions and unanswered mandatory items
BuyerBid and proposal managers
04 Live

Standards gap analysis

Your SOPs, systems or QMS mapped clause by clause against the standard, with every gap and the evidence you already hold.

Gap Agent →
ReferenceGMP, Annex 11, ISO 13485, MDR, AS9100, NESAS
SourcesSOPs, QMS documents, system records
OutputClause-by-clause gap list with linked evidence
BuyerQuality and regulatory leads
05 Live

Traceability and change impact

Requirement to test to evidence, built as work happens. When something changes, you see exactly what it touches before you approve it.

Trace Agent →
ReferenceRequirements and design inputs
SourcesSpecs, test scripts, executed results
OutputA live trace matrix and change-impact list
BuyerValidation and design-control owners

Running today: URS to vendor test spec to evidence, inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer.

Reconcile data

Number-heavy checks with deterministic matching. We are looking for design partners.

06

Contract vs PO and invoice

Price, quantities and terms matched across contract, purchase order and invoice before payment is released.

Become a design partner →
ReferenceContract or framework agreement
SourcesPurchase orders and invoices
OutputMismatches on price, quantity and terms
BuyerFinance and procurement operations
07

Financial audit

Ledger entries and spend checked against their supporting evidence and the rules they must follow.

Become a design partner →
ReferenceProcurement rules, grant conditions, policy
SourcesLedger entries and supporting documents
OutputExceptions, each linked to the missing or conflicting evidence
BuyerInternal audit and finance control

By industry

Where each use case fits best today.

Use caseLife SciencesMedical DevicesAerospaceAviationTelecomConstructionIndustrial OEMs
Requirements drafting–––
Offer vs requirements–
RFI/RFP response check–––
Standards gap analysis––
Traceability––––
Contract vs PO vs invoice–––––
Strong fitPlausible, testing with customers
Two sides, one engine

One side writes the requirements. The other has to prove them.

Your AI CQO works for both. Same evidence chain, from both ends.

Buyers & operators

Check what you receive.

  • Requirements split into testable, risk-tagged items.
  • Supplier evidence matched to the page that proves it.
  • Gaps found before you sign the PO or the acceptance.
  • Bids scored against your tender, clause by clause.
Offer vs requirements
Builders & suppliers

Prove what you built.

  • Protocols drafted from your engineering data: IQ/OQ, FAT/SAT, test specs.
  • Compliance matrices answered against the customer’s URS.
  • Manuals and declarations kept consistent and versioned.
  • Pre-checked against what the buyer will audit.
RFI and RFP response check

Send one closed evaluation. Get back the matrix your team would have built.

Get a free gap reportMeet the agents