Home›Use cases›Offer vs requirements
Offer vs requirements

Every bid checked against every requirement. Proof behind each answer.

Catch what a vendor silently misses before award, not as change orders after it.

10×faster bid comparison
Gap6.1.3 Data retentionBid B says 7 years, p.31
01Avoided gapsNo change orders, re-validation or findings from a missed line.
02Cycle timeWeeks earlier to a vendor decision.
03LabourNo cross-reading bids by hand.
04LeverageEvery gap is an evidence-linked vendor question.
What you get

A verdict on every line. A person signs.

Reference
Technical spec, URS or RFP
Compared
Supplier bids, any number, any language
Output
Compliance matrix per bid
Buyer
Procurement, Engineering, Validation

Running today inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer.

By industry

Where it pays off.

No call needed

Send one closed evaluation.

Names redacted. Get back the matrix your team would have built. No call needed.

3-week pilot. A backtest on work you have already done. Success criteria agreed up front.

Three questions we’ll ask
  1. How many formal evaluations do you run a year?
  2. Who signs off the technical evaluation?
  3. What was the last requirement you found missing after award?