Built on pharma validation. Deployed inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer.
Home/Industries/Aerospace
Aerospace

Certification evidence that traces itself.

Every high-level requirement linked to its low-level requirements, its test cases and its results. Every customer or authority clause answered with evidence. Agents draft the matrices and reports. Your engineers review and sign.

DO-178CDO-254ARP4754AAS/EN 9100EASA Part 21 / 145
The problem in aerospace

The aircraft is ready. The paperwork isn’t.

Certification and continued airworthiness both depend on one thing: being able to show, for every requirement, the evidence that it was met. That chain breaks in the same four places.

Documents & standards

The documents an aerospace evidence chain runs through.

What the engine reads, links and drafts. You decide which of these are in scope for a design-partner project.

01PSAC / PHAC02System requirements03High-level requirements04Low-level requirements05Test cases & procedures06Verification results07Trace data08SAS / HAS09Compliance matrix10First Article Inspection11Conformity records12MRO task cards13Release certificates14Supplier qualification

The standards it works to.

Each requirement keeps a link to the objective or clause it comes from, so coverage is measured against the standard, not a template.

DO-178CSoftware objectives, trace and verification
DO-254Airborne electronic hardware
ARP4754ASystem development and derived requirements
AS/EN 9100Quality management for aviation, space, defence
AS9102First Article Inspection
EASA Part 21Design and production organisation approval
EASA Part 145Maintenance organisation documentation
CS-25 / FAR 25Certification basis compliance matrices
Both ends of the handshake

For the operator who specifies. And the manufacturer who proves.

Buyer · Airlines, MROs, integrators

Check what suppliers deliver against what you specified.

Engineering, quality and procurement teams that write the specification and accept the part, system or maintenance record.

  • Specification decomposition into testable requirements with IDs
  • Supplier evidence review: test reports, FAIs and conformity records matched to each requirement
  • MRO documentation checks: task cards and release records against the maintenance data
  • Audit readiness for authority and customer audits
Builder · Aircraft & component manufacturers

Produce certification evidence that is complete before review.

Tier-1 and tier-2 suppliers, avionics and software houses, structures and systems manufacturers.

  • Trace data from system to HLR, LLR and test, kept live across baselines
  • Test cases drafted for requirements with no coverage
  • Compliance matrices answered against the customer specification or certification basis
  • FAI and conformity packs assembled from your own records. For Builders →
Start with your own documents

Send a specification and its evidence. See every untested requirement.

You bring one real document set: a specification and the verification evidence behind it. We run the engine on it with your engineers, in your standards and templates.

How we start

What you get.

  • A gap report on your own documents within the first two weeks
  • Deployment inside your perimeter, with your choice of model
  • Direct line to the founders and engineers building it

We reply within two working days.

Thank you. Request received.

An engineer will reply within two working days.

Our reference deployment is in pharmaceutical validation. Screens on this page show illustrative examples, not customer data.

FAQ

Aerospace questions.

Does Qualitum replace our requirements management tool?

No. Keep DOORS, Polarion, Jama or whatever you run. Qualitum reads from it and from your documents, checks coverage against evidence and writes trace and gap results back as records your team reviews.

Is Qualitum a qualified tool under DO-330?

Not today. Agent outputs are drafts that your engineers review and sign, so the engine does not replace a verification activity. If a customer needs tool qualification for a specific use, we scope it with them.

Can it run in an export-controlled environment?

It is deployed single-tenant inside your perimeter, air-gap capable, with your choice of model. No data leaves your environment. Specific ITAR or EAR arrangements are agreed per partner.

Who signs?

Your engineers, verification leads and compliance staff. Agents draft. Humans approve and sign, every time.

Find the untested requirement before the review does.