Home›Use cases›Executed protocol and evidence review
Executed protocol and evidence review

Every executed test reviewed. Before QA sees it.

Missing signatures, out-of-range results and undocumented deviations, found while they can be fixed.

Send one executed protocolSee the output
100%of records reviewed
FindingOQ-11.4 Alarm testScreenshot missing
01Avoided findingsGDP gaps caught before inspection.
02Cycle timeFaster QA review and release.
03CoverageEvery record, not a sample.
04Fewer loopsFixed before it reaches QA.
What you get

A verdict on every line. A person signs.

Reference
Approved protocols, GDP, ALCOA+
Compared
Executed tests, screenshots, signatures
Output
Findings per test step
Buyer
QA, Validation
By industry

Where it pays off.

Pharma & Life SciencesExecuted protocols checked against GDP and ALCOA+.
No call needed

Send one executed protocol.

Get every finding, step by step, linked to the record. Compare with your QA review.

Get a free gap reportBook a working session

3-week pilot. A backtest on work you have already done. Success criteria agreed up front.

Three questions we’ll ask
  1. How many executed protocols does QA review a month?
  2. How many review loops per package?
  3. What are your most common GDP findings?
RelatedRisk assessment and IQ/OQ/PQ protocolsTraceability and change impactStandards gap analysisAll use cases →