The full DPS lifecycle - one agent.
Tender·AI covers Article 34 end-to-end. Contract notices, ESPD handling, exclusion and selection verification, admission decisions, mini-competitions, MEAT evaluation, and procedural-review-grade award files. Designed for contracting authorities who defend decisions in public.
Ingest → reason → draft → execute → defend.
Five agent stages, fully observable. Every step produces a procedurally-compliant artifact, signed by the contracting authority, with an immutable audit trail back to the directive article it satisfies.
Read the requirement
Authority briefs, prior DPS files, category strategies, national procurement law overlays, eligibility registers, exclusion databases. Parsed and indexed inside your tenant.
Apply the directive
Article mapping across 2014/24/EU. Threshold tests. Procedure choice justified. Selection criteria proportionate to contract value. Transparency and non-discrimination enforced by construction.
Author the procedure
Contract notice to OJEU eForms schema. Procurement documents. ESPD template. Evaluation model with MEAT weights. Mini-competition invitations. All signed per your delegation matrix.
Run the procedure
Verify ESPD responses. Check mandatory exclusions against registers. Admit qualifying economic operators. Evaluate tenders per MEAT. Flag abnormally low tenders. Draft debrief letters.
Survive the challenge
Tamper-evident procurement file. Every notice version, every clarification, every score traceable. Award decision ready for national review bodies and court of audit on day zero.
What it reads. What it produces.
Tender·AI connects to the registers, portals, and archives contracting authorities already depend on - and produces the procurement file that review bodies already recognise.
Data sources
- Authority briefs, category strategies, prior DPS files
- ESPD responses (XML + PDF attachments)
- Central exclusion registers, debarment lists, UBO data
- National procurement portals (TED, eNotices2, domestic eTendering)
- CPV, CPC, NUTS classification corpora
- Directive 2014/24/EU, national transposition, case law
- Authority ERP, budget codes, contract registry
Artifacts produced
- Contract notice with CPV codes (eForms)
- Procurement documents + ESPD template
- ESPD verification log · exclusion check
- Admission decision + reasoned rejection letters
- Mini-competition invitations + tender responses
- MEAT-weighted scoring with citation trail
- Award decision + standstill letters + debriefs
Mini-competition under an active DPS.
A public health authority runs a three-year DPS for laboratory reagents. Article 34 requires that each mini-competition under the DPS re-open to all admitted operators with full transparency. Tender·AI drafts the invitation, parses responses, applies MEAT, and produces the award decision - with a procedural trail that survives national review.
Award Decision · MC-0412
Operator B · weighted MEAT score 87.2 / 100 · pending Art. 69 response from Operator D.
NOTICE → ADM-15 → INV-15 → TND-6 → MEAT → AWD
- Authored by Tender·AI. Reviewed by contracting authority. Audit trail: every notice, every admission, every score.
Architected around the regimes that matter.
Tender·AI produces award files that survive national review bodies, courts of audit, and - where applicable - the Court of Justice of the EU. Compliance isn’t an annex; it’s how the system works.
Public procurement
Article 34 DPS end-to-end. Open, restricted, competitive dialogue, innovation partnership. Procedure choice defensible to the directive article that authorises it.
Utilities procurement
Water, energy, transport, postal service contracting authorities. Different thresholds, different rules - mapped natively.
Defence & security
Sensitive contracts, information security, supply security, subcontracting regime - handled with segregated tenant and restricted access.
Notice publication
Contract notices, award notices, modification notices drafted to the current eForms schema. Publication via eSender or TED eNotices2.
Self-declaration
ESPD request drafted per the Commission’s Implementing Regulation. Response parsed, evidence requested only when and where Art. 59 allows.
Challenge & review
Directives 89/665 and 92/13. Standstill period honoured. Debrief letters drafted. National review body format supported out of the box.
Data & cyber
Tenderer data processed on lawful basis. Processor duties honoured. Public-sector cyber requirements reflected in selection criteria.
High-risk AI governance
Procurement by public bodies is explicitly in scope. Human oversight, transparency, risk management, post-market monitoring - operational, not documentary.
Sits on your stack. Your data never leaves your tenant.
TED · eNotices2
Direct publication of contract notices, award notices, and modification notices to the EU’s Tenders Electronic Daily.
ESPD service
ESPD request generation and response ingestion per Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/7.
Domestic eTendering
Connectors to national eTendering platforms across EU member states. Authority-branded publication preserved.
Mercell · Vortal · eB2B
Bi-directional connectors to regional eProcurement suites used by contracting authorities.
Central exclusion registers
Mandatory exclusion checks against national and EU debarment registers. UBO screening via national business registers.
SAP PS · Oracle Public Sector
Budget line commitment, purchase-order issuance, and multi-year contract liability tracking.
DocuSign CLM · Adobe Sign
Authority-side contract signature and clause archive. Qualified electronic signatures where national law requires.
SharePoint · Nextcloud
Procurement file archival for the full statutory retention period. Read-native, write with governance.
eIDAS · Okta · Entra ID
Public-sector SSO, qualified identity for signatories, role-based agent permissions by procedure.
- Qualitum sits on your stack. Your data never leaves your tenant.
Built for authorities who defend decisions in public.
Public buyers, regulated utilities, defence, and healthcare procurement bodies operate under a standard their private-sector peers don’t: every award can be challenged, reviewed, and - if indefensible - annulled. Tender·AI is architected so the procurement file, not the press release, is the primary artifact.
Stop defending spreadsheets. Start defending decisions.
Book a 45-minute working session with a forward-deployed engineer. Bring a real DPS, a real contract notice, or a real award file that needs to survive review.
Book a working sessionOr email hello@qualitum.ai