Qualitum checks every bid and supplier submission against your tender, clause by clause, and shows the evidence behind each answer. Equipment candidates scored against your URS. Design qualification drafted. Your evaluators decide.
Evaluators read hundreds of pages per bid to check claims they have no time to verify. The wrong award costs years.
Requirements scattered across specification, annexes and standards.
Bidders tick “comply” without pointing to proof.
Each evaluator scores differently, in their own file.
The unproven claim surfaces at FAT or in operation.
Qualitum keeps the chain intact - as data, not documents.
What the engine reads, links and drafts. Every item keeps a link to the requirement it answers.
Coverage is measured against the clause, not against a template.
Procurement, engineering and quality teams running tenders and supplier selection.
Bid and sales-engineering teams. For GxP suppliers →
Formerly Procurato. Now part of the Qualitum engine.
Tender, criteria and every bid received.
Each requirement becomes a weighted, numbered clause.
Every answer linked to proof, or flagged as unproven.
The panel decides. The evaluation record is complete and auditable.
We check each clause of your tender against the bid and list what is proven, partial or unsupported.
Our reference deployment is in pharmaceutical validation. Screens on this page show illustrative examples, not customer data.
Procurato is now part of Qualitum. The same tender-compliance capability runs on the Qualitum engine, and procurato.ai redirects here.
No. It scores evidence and drafts the evaluation. Your panel decides and signs.
No. Agents draft and check. Your qualified people review, approve and sign every output.
In a single-tenant deployment inside your environment, with your choice of model, EU, US or UAE residency and air-gap capability. No training on your data.